Britain Ruled by Political Correctness

 by Soeren Kern

...this is truly scary. It means the Islamists are winning in Britain. Where is the EDL? It was made for just things such as this. TAKE BACK YOUR COUNTRY BRITS!! C'mon people, grow some balls. The media should be outraged. Parents should be aware and spreading this information. And where are the freakin' whistle blowers. If it was me...I would be shouting this out on street corners.

Since when have Islamists started intimidating us? This is alarming and frighting. Wake up Brits or America is next. Thank the lord we have the conservative blogs and rousing speakers as Brigitte Gabriel and Pam Geller and Robert Spencer. -BBJ

    A three-month trial that recently ended in Liverpool, where nine Muslim men were found guilty of raping dozens of British children, revealed that police and social workers in northern England repeatedly refuse to investigate Muslim paedophile gangs: they said they are afraid of being called racist.

(Soooooo...we cannot trust our law enforcement to do their damned jobs anymore)

The disturbing details that emerged during the trial have opened yet another chapter in a long-running debate about multiculturalism in Britain, where many say that political correctness has gone too far. (YA THINK??)

Less than a month after the trial in Liverpool ended on May 9, it emerged that social workers in the City of Rotherham, also in northern England, had known for six years that a teenage mother (identified as Child S) who was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex, was at clear risk from predatory Muslim gangs.

On May 29, Rotherham Council's Safeguarding Children Board published a so-called Serious Case Review, but key politically incorrect passages which reveal that they had known she was at particular risk from "Asian men" (Muslim men) were blocked out with black lines.

The council went to court in an attempt to suppress the hidden information after an uncensored copy of the report was leaked to a British newspaper, but the legal action was eventually abandoned. The uncensored report confirmed that Child S had pursued dealings with 15 different agencies, and identified "numerous missed opportunities" to protect her; observers believe the agencies failed to do so because they did not want to be branded as racist. (Bottom line...they didn't want to be branded as racist by a group of rapists. FIRE THEM ALL!! They do not deserve those jobs. They do not want to properly perform the service they were hired to do. Worse off...they have no concerns for the young rape victim. FIRE THEM NOW!!)

 Read more HERE